VIVAnews - berlatarkan problem of religious violence in Indonesia re-occur. Over the span of a year, at least outbreaks of violence in some areas. Like the case of pilgrims clashed HKBP Bekasi, Bogor and clashed Ahmadiyya in Pandeglang, as well as unrest in Waterford, Central Java According to the rector of Paramadina, Anies Baswedan, began to rise again clashed mass based on religion in recent clashes began when the mass in Tanjung Priok in April 2010. "Reflecting the experience of the Tanjung Priok case of mass religious flagged by the government, there are three Satpol PP were killed, 69 wounded and 36 cars damaged. But the number of suspects zero alias does not exist," he said when met at Paramadina Campus, Wednesday, February 9, 2011. Of course, he adds, given this reality, the people who potentially committed acts of violence as if getting the message and the momentum of the Tanjung Priok case that if the collective violence and berbenderakan religion would silenced. "Never mind the violence against the people, violence against officers who spearheaded the country just ignored," said Anies. Anies argue, is due to the rampant conflicts of sociological factors and economic pressures of society. "I see the problem of sociological, economic pressures have not changed now and five years earlier. Although his condition was up and down," he said. According to him, the main problem is omission and indecision by the security forces and government against rioters. "The government seems silent, allowing the potential for violence emerged. And in any country, there are many officers who are often afraid to go in that area (religion)," said Anies For that, Anies admitted to accomplish for religious clashes are not widespread, it takes assertiveness government, especially the president to provide protection and legal certainty to the police to act. Because, in general, the security officer is usually on guard at the site, but they do not dare to act decisively. "Actually, the security forces have the right to use violence to fight violence. But if there is no guarantee, then the security officer would think twice to act decisively. We were scared, now act decisively, will be in trouble after the event," said Anies. Thus, Anies continued, the president needed support to security personnel in the form of guaranteed protection. As if the president is present at the site and provide support to security personnel on guard. "So, the president should not make the team or task force again or come to the location of the riot to solve the problem. But enough to provide protection to security personnel on guard," he said. (Sj)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar