Save, Send astronauts to Mars 60 Years of Age (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)
VIVAnews - Going to Mars so the human dream, especially those experts who like to explore space. Moreover, the red planet is approaching the planet earth, adan human colony has been targeted so if one day the Earth more and more damaged and unfit for habitation again.
Realising the dream was not an easy task. In addition to problems of inadequate technology, the mission is also constrained about the fund.
To minimize costs, some scientists suggested that a trip to Mars is one way. That is, so go there, do not come back to earth.
The scientists said the colonization of Mars will be realized faster and cheaper if the astronauts to behave like the first settlers in the United States. They never expect to go home.
That adalag, "The main point, for exploration of Mars to materialize," said Dirk Schulze-Makuch, Washington State University professor who published a controversial article, as published Daily Mail, Wednesday, November 17, 2010.
He proposed the mission begins shipping two 60-year-old astronaut who will fly in two different aircraft - the aircraft also serves as their residence on Mars. Furthermore, colony ships and supplies would have depreciated later.
The publication of this article less than a month after NASA let slip was investigating the possibility of human colonization on other planets in the ambitious project called 'Hundred Years Starship'.
Meanwhile, another scientist, Paul Davies, a physicist at Arizona State University argues, humans have colonized other planets to anticipate the catastrophe on Earth.
"We recommend that sent people aged 60 years or so."
The reason, the mission to outer space will certainly reduce umurr someone - either due to lack of medical care as well as exposure to radiation in large numbers.
Radiation can also damage the reproductive organs, so sending people in the fertile age is not a good idea.
Meanwhile, to travel one way, it is estimated could cut the budget by 80 percent.
However, both Davies and Schulze-Makuch said it was important means to realize that this is not a 'suicide mission'.
But, "astronauts on Mars would stay there all his life, became a pioneer of human colonization permanently in the red planet." For this reason, the psychological profile of astronauts, including the intensity of communication with Earth to be an important factor.
The idea of this one-way opposition from some parties. Including, former Apollo 14 astronaut, Edgar Mitchell. "It's premature. We're not ready to undergo anything like this."
NASA did not agree with this. "We want the astronauts could return to Earth."
Realising the dream was not an easy task. In addition to problems of inadequate technology, the mission is also constrained about the fund.
To minimize costs, some scientists suggested that a trip to Mars is one way. That is, so go there, do not come back to earth.
The scientists said the colonization of Mars will be realized faster and cheaper if the astronauts to behave like the first settlers in the United States. They never expect to go home.
That adalag, "The main point, for exploration of Mars to materialize," said Dirk Schulze-Makuch, Washington State University professor who published a controversial article, as published Daily Mail, Wednesday, November 17, 2010.
He proposed the mission begins shipping two 60-year-old astronaut who will fly in two different aircraft - the aircraft also serves as their residence on Mars. Furthermore, colony ships and supplies would have depreciated later.
The publication of this article less than a month after NASA let slip was investigating the possibility of human colonization on other planets in the ambitious project called 'Hundred Years Starship'.
Meanwhile, another scientist, Paul Davies, a physicist at Arizona State University argues, humans have colonized other planets to anticipate the catastrophe on Earth.
"We recommend that sent people aged 60 years or so."
The reason, the mission to outer space will certainly reduce umurr someone - either due to lack of medical care as well as exposure to radiation in large numbers.
Radiation can also damage the reproductive organs, so sending people in the fertile age is not a good idea.
Meanwhile, to travel one way, it is estimated could cut the budget by 80 percent.
However, both Davies and Schulze-Makuch said it was important means to realize that this is not a 'suicide mission'.
But, "astronauts on Mars would stay there all his life, became a pioneer of human colonization permanently in the red planet." For this reason, the psychological profile of astronauts, including the intensity of communication with Earth to be an important factor.
The idea of this one-way opposition from some parties. Including, former Apollo 14 astronaut, Edgar Mitchell. "It's premature. We're not ready to undergo anything like this."
NASA did not agree with this. "We want the astronauts could return to Earth."
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar